Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impunity Watch

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Impunity Watch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic does not meet WP:GNG or any other notability guideline. (It appears to be unrelated to a Dutch organization calling itself by the same name). I searched for any reliable independent sources that cover this journal in depth and could be used to build an encyclopedic article according to WP:NOR ("Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources"), but as another editor commented on the talk page, "unfortunately this article does not have any reliable sources that I could find". (t · c) buidhe 23:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 07:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.