Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improvolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 21:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improvolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Only a few short entries in listicles and trivial mentions. C F A 💬 19:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Theatre, Organizations, Companies, Schools, and New York. C F A 💬 19:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - edit history is a mess, but seems it was previously nominated for WP:PROD before. Someone did object, but the citations still aren't enough to be WP:NCORP beyond standard promotional stuff. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 01:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the coverage doesn't fulfill WP CORPDEPTH or GNG. Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete None of the references meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.