Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immigration Watch Canada (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT point #3. This nomination is just too erroneous (although the editor may have read the article), and consensus in the previous AfD discussion, which was closed with a keep result five days before the article was renominated here, had unanimous consensus for retention (except for the nominator). Furthermore, the organization's website here is not dead, and the organization is not defunct. This is evident per the organization having published several bulletins on their website in 2017, the most recent occurring on February 28, 2017 (link). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Immigration Watch Canada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We have no need for an article on a defunct organization that has no historical value. I just noticed this was just up for deletion last month ...after I made this nomination....sorry. anyone free tO cancel this nomination if it's too soon. But was anyone aware the site has been dead for almost a year. http://www.immigrationwatchcanada.org/ organization was never able to raise funds. Moxy (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.