Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immediate Media Company
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. LFaraone 01:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Immediate Media Company (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The company does not have the support to be considered notable. Likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article clearly needs a lot of work, but the company is notable, and controls a large number of important UK publications Jasonfward (talk) 21:44, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- This is a poor stub, but the BBC magazines had a high profile, before the BBC withdrew from many of its non-broadcasting activities, following complaints that they were engaged in unfair competition, being licence fee funded. The article certainly needs singificnat expansion. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Agree with both comments above, the company has become very powerful in the UK publishing industry so to delete the article would I think be a little rash. It definitely needs drastic improvements however. Aw16 (talk) 11:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.