Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Might Be a Cunt, but I'm Not a Fucking Cunt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to www.tism.wanker.com. czar 05:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Might Be a Cunt, but I'm Not a Fucking Cunt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 (talk) 03:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As described in the article, this was quite a controversial song, so there should be sources that discuss the controversy but the article is currently unsourced. But it is close to 20 years old so it may be difficult to find them online. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to www.tism.wanker.com. If sources can be found, some of this could be merged there, but otherwise a redirect is about all that can be justified. --Michig (talk) 06:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 14:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Mich. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. It might be a subject, but it's not a notable subject. editorEهեইдအ😎 23:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to www.tism.wanker.com. I see one source has been added now, but I still don't think it's enough to satisfy the likes of WP:GNG. I believe a redirect would work here, it's probably a likely search term. Omni Flames (talk) 06:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.