Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Love Money (Season 2)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 03:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I Love Money (Season 2) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable at this time -- purely promotional advertisement. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 17:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This is a future television show which is scheduled to air on VH1 in about 20 days. I believe it is both notable, in that the show will air on a major cable television network, and more than promotional advertisement. The amount of information and number of sources will surely increase dramatically over the next few weeks. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: if season 1 was notable, season 2 will be. Worst case, merge to season one and rename that article...--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Isn't that very WP:CRYSTAL-ish? -- Gmatsuda (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep: Asking to have a page deleted when it has all been clearly cited and it will only be recreated in a couple days is ridiculous. I think this was placed frivolously and without being looked into seriously. There is so much information relating to the show that it is clearly not speculative, it is not WP:CRYSTAL, it's not purely promotional, as was stated. It is fact, and if the information is not varied enough as was placed on the page earlier and removed by me, fine. More references can be provided. But to delete it all together is pointless.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 20:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: If am article with the same content is deleted per an AfD, it will be speedy deleted. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 20:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It has come to light that the reason this page was listed for deletion was because a different editor Dev 103 copied the pages format, table, and then called it something else before it was subsequently cleaned up and fixed. That show should not take away from this actual show and its actual date of actual premiere. Whether or not this For The Love of Ray J is going to be formatted the same way is something I don't know about or care, but deleting the original on baseless claims that it is promotional is simply not true.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 01:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The show is premeing in less then 3 weeks so why is this being considered for deletion. Then is no point why if everything is refrenced then there is NO point of being deleted now. It will be back up in three weeks so why would you delete it and then your going to have people who worked hard on that page. so please reconsider and change your mind. ––Spiderman2351 (talk) 04:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Spiderman2351[reply]
- Strong Keep. There is NO reason to delete this page. Elefuntboy (talk) 22:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.