Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITEA Project AURORA
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ITEA Project AURORA
- ITEA Project AURORA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:GNG, but perhaps I'm looking in the wrong places? SarahStierch (talk) 06:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There have been a whole raft of articles created and deleted about minor EU research projects. This would appear to be another from the series. This one is more readable than the typical one, but it remains quite vague, and doesn't really contain an assertion of minimal significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The external links are perplexing: the first purports to be to the project domain but seems instead to be for a project called "EASY Interactions" (and for a human-system interaction page has some of the most shocking hover-and-shudder graphics I've ever seen; how long before the EU funds "research" into blinking marquee Comic Sans text?); the second is to a root directory. All very exciting. I speculate that this project never got beyond the proposal stage? At any rate, no notability and should be put out its misery. AllyD (talk) 20:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.