Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITC Holding Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:54, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITC Holding Company

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:SERIESA. Non-notable holding company with a couple notable holdings (notability is not inherited). Sources are all routine announcements or to the company's own site. Little to no coverage of this company specifically. FalconK (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Georgia (U.S. state). FalconK (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per WP:CORPDEPTH, there is only trivial or incidental coverage. Citations within the article itself are not independent, secondary, or reliable. Indeed, several links are broken and I am not able to locate these sources elsewhere. Further, company reports are not independent. Standard Google search provides pages of primary sources from the company, reviews on Glassdoor, etc. Google news provides some trivial or incidental coverage. Overall per WP:CORP, notability is not established. Such-change47 (talk) 00:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.