Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISlate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ISlate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is only based on rumours and speculation. If/when Apple releases a table called "iSlate" this article can be recreated. Andareed (talk) 19:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the post to segment the facts from significance of the mark. rabhyanker (talk) 19:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing notable - to quote the article "This trademark would otherwise not warrant mention but for the notoriety it has recently received" notoriety based on rumour and speculation - Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation.. Lame Name (talk) 21:32, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Numerous notable sources have provided great amounts of insight into this tablet during its 7-year-long development timeline. Either keep the article or move it to Apple Tablet, the name most sources ascribe to this product. White 720 (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An article about tons of rumors around a product with a launch date is notable. Rumors come from high profile news organizations such as Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, etc... The article needs to be clear that it is about rumor. If that isn't done then it should be deleted. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article has many reliable sources and is becoming more notable every day. —Terrence and Phillip 14:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.