Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Mumbai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ISKCON Temple, Mumbai

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of detailed coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NBUILDING. Search only gives promotional press statements. This temple fails WP:NORG. No asserted notability or indication why this temple is notable to have its own article. Lack of detailed coverage in reliable media. Unsourced promtional article, part of ISKCON spam on Wikipedia. (See similar recent AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Salem and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Ujjain) Venkat TL (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:57, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. - Hatchens (talk) 11:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NBUILD and WP:NORG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.