Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IQ Beats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IQ Beats

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find sources that show IQ Beats is the "subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources" as per WP:ORG. The article lacks references and searches are only turning up first-party or trivial coverage. Stesmo (talk) 22:29, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Though this is a company that produces jingles, etc., it seems to me that they would need to meet WP:ORG and not WP:NMUSIC. I recognize that I may be wrong in this understanding... Stesmo (talk) 22:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Google search fails to uncover the kind of independent sources which would indicate that the entity in question qualifies as notable under WP:MUSIC and/or WP:MEDIA. Quis separabit? 12:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.