Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPextreme Inc.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per consensus below. Almost any adminstrator will restore content to user-space upon request in order to write a proper article. - brenneman 03:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
IPextreme Inc.
Spam. Only contribution from this user. Chris 07:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. --MaNeMeBasat 12:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Meant to be a factual article about a company that's becoming relevant in the semiconductor industry. I believe it meets the notability and reference criteria. As for only contribution - you have to start somewhere. Trent.Tpoltron 18:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as unencyclopedic. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 19:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete as spam for nn-company and conflict of interest. [User:Tpoltron]] is listed in company website as Director of Marketing. [1]. Montco 04:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete reads like spam, and no evidence to support notability under WP:CORP. CiaranG 10:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Based on a couple of the better additional sources supplied below, the company seems notable to me. I don't like the conflict of interest, but I don't feel that alone is a reason for deletion. The article as it stands is still unencylopedic though, and needs a rewrite by someone without the COI. CiaranG 23:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
TpoltronYes, I'm a marketing guy at IPextreme and was trying to create an unbiased entry on our company (and admittedly it can be hard not to drink your own Coolaid). I use Wikipedia almost daily and appreciate your efforts to keep it unbiased but IPextreme engineers have published papers on technologies such as Bluetooth: http://pd.pennnet.com/display_article/279061/21/ARTCL/none/none/Bluetooth_stereo_realized/ and FlexRay: http://www.automotivedesignline.com/howto/193501262 . The company is significant because we are the exclusive worldwide source to license such notable technologies as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coldfire . IPextreme seems every bit as significant as many other companies with Wikipedia entries, can someone just verify and edit the entry as appropriate? thanx, trentTpoltron
Tpoltron 23:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC) I also posted this on the AfD note by the entry page in response to a request for published references written by others. I referenced these two articles that appeared in industry publications in my original submission:
http://www.edn.com/article/CA6287336.html
http://www.edn.com/article/CA6393624.html?partner=eb&nid=2961&rid=1057301298[reply]
Here are some others: New Electronics Magazine covering a speech from Senior Gartner Analyst that talks about the importance of large semiconductor making their technology available, through IPextreme: http://www.ip-extreme.com/downloads/NewElectronics_090107.pdf
From the UK equivalent of IEEE: http://www.ip-extreme.com/downloads/ESSAugSep06.pdf
From EE Times in the USA: http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=193600746
An article about how we are shaking up the industry from France: http://silicon.fr/fr/silicon/news/2006/12/10/ip-soc-2006-l-industrie-semi
From Japan: http://www.ip-extreme.com/downloads/nikkeiBP_Article20061023.pdf
The articles from our engineers ran in technical industry trade magazines and jounrals.
I can supply more, or more in certain areas. Regards, Trent Tpoltron 23:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.