Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INOKrypt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 22:31, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

INOKrypt

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable run of the mill framework Praxidicae (talk) 18:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:20, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted because the article topic is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4053:59D:AC1D:148D:9A26:EA35:958B (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Clearly non-notable framework. No mention in significant publications. All sources are to a GitHub page with just two stars and just 12 commits. Johand¹⁹⁹ ^(Talk) 13:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly not notable. If there were an A7 for software it would possibly apply. No sources indicating notability.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:24, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.