Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IMeta

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Still no clear consensus on this. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 23:37, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IMeta

Tagged for speedy as "not notable", but not a candidate. The article has in fact been on VFD before. It was ages ago, so long ago that the debate is on the article's talkpage, when it was kept due to no consensus. No vote. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:22, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• I did not vote last time. Either make the article more informative or delete. Manik Raina 13:30, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• I tagged it for speedy. It's a non notable company for what I know from this article. Either it is updated to point out the notability of this company also to someone like me who doesn't know why he should care, or it should be deleted. --Raistlin 14:55, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• I would say keep. Even though it is a stub, its still valuble to Wikipedia. FireFox 16:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: valuable in which way ? Wikipedia is not a business directory... can you explain your pov more in detail please? --Raistlin 10:04, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unlesss notability can be shown, above being another IT consulting company. --Icelight 17:48, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Does not appear to meet deletion criteria. Trollderella 20:09, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 14:13, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]