Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IC Markets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Both the nominator and delete voter are confirmed blocked sockpuppets. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IC Markets

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Present coverage is not enough for GNG. A case of refbomb. There are not WP:RS present. Citterz (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Citterz (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable organization that fails to satisfy WP:NCORP. Most of sources are press releases and announcements. Setreis (talk) 13:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This AFD appears to have been opened in bad faith and I have blocked both participants as socks. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:46, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.