Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICT Housekeeper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ICT Housekeeper

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements per Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Products_and_services

"If a company is notable, information on its products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy."

Company is not notable enough to have its own page, therefore we cannot merge the information over.

In addition, many of the references appear out dated or self published. ReformedArsenal (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | communicate _ 17:38, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note - part of the problem here seems to be that most of the sources provided in support of the article are in Thai so there is no way for non-Thai-speaking editors to verify that the sources say what the original editors claim they say. I have asked User:Manop to have a look at the article (he is listed at Wikipedia:Translators available for Thai-English). With a better understanding of the sources, hopefully a consensus can be built about the subject itself. Stalwart111 (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 10:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly this should be redirected to Internet censorship in Thailand? There was at least one demonstrable untruth on the page - I would be very skeptical about the other claims it makes. Morwen - Talk 22:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:23, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't find any reliable third-party coverage of this tool. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - having had no response to the above request I suppose I have no choice but to opine for deletion until we can get some clear reliable sources to establish notability. Cheers, Stalwart111 05:52, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.