Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBC Balita Ngayon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 02:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IBC Balita Ngayon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was made by a sock of Lpkids2006, if he keeps creating any articles, the admins shall block the account as a sock of Lpkids2006. KGirlTrucker87^{talk what I'm been doing} 22:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as proposer. KGirlTrucker87^{talk what I'm been doing} 22:20, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:40, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable to have an independent article as per WP:RPRGM. I think whether it was created by a sock belongs in another forum. $Tushi Talk To Me$ 06:20, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 04:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it only existed 2 years and there's frankly simply nothing actually suggesting it can be independently notable, nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:44, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.