Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I/O bound process

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. We don't merge unsourced content. Secret ^account 16:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I/O bound process

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It duplicates an existing (even better) article: I/O bound. Vinkje83 (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with the nom that the topic of this article is a duplicate of the I/O bound article and that I/O bound does a better job at covering and referencing the topic. --Mark viking (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd say merge to I/O bound but there doesn't seem like much here worth keeping. Ducknish (talk) 22:41, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious merge (this didn't need AfD), good luck in finding some content worth using. The better title is at I/O bound process, so deletion isn't appropriate for either. Neither of these articles are particularly good quality. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.