Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I/O (album)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination, but no point relisting a third time - this has been open for > 1 month Go Phightins! 01:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I/O (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This album was never made. It was the working title for an album that Peter Gabriel was working on many years ago but he then abandoned it and even Gabriel has stated that nothing was ever finished and that it was just some ideas he had for an album. It doesn't warrant being an article because it obviously fails notability. Glamoria (talk) 21:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep(ish) On the basis of what the article says, it appears that there is notability even though the album may not conform to the standard criteria. I'm willing to be dissuaded. Deb (talk) 11:51, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As the lead says "Gabriel stated that he had not actually completed the recording of any songs for I/O and that the project was merely a set of "song ideas" which remain unfinished"...No real value that I can see. If songs had been written and used on subsequent albums etc...then that may be different. SethWhales talk 08:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 15:56, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 18:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.