Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperspace theory
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Hyperspace (science fiction). JERRY talk contribs 21:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hyperspace theory
- Hyperspace theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
per Wikipedia:DEL#REASON: "All attempts to find reliable sources in which article information can be verified have failed". Emphasis on the word reliable Uniqueuponhim (talk) 02:09, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to hyperspace. Frank Knee Capra (talk) 02:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Minkowski space to avoid double redirect. Sting_au Talk 04:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to either Minkowski spacetime or Hyperspace (science fiction). They don't need to go to a disambiguation page. — BQZip01 — talk 06:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This article is attempting to describe an actual scientific theory which the Minkowski spacetime article covers well. If this article is indeed changed to a redirect then probably better to direct towards pure science rather than the science fiction variety. At least that will be in the spirit of what was intended for this page. It's true that redirect to either page avoids a double redirect but Minkowski spacetime better destination in my opinion. Sting_au Talk 11:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to note, Minkowski spacetime redirects to Minkowski space so if the page is redirected to that one, please ensure that it is the latter and not the former so that there are not multiple redirects. Uniqueuponhim (talk) 12:37, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This article is attempting to describe an actual scientific theory which the Minkowski spacetime article covers well. If this article is indeed changed to a redirect then probably better to direct towards pure science rather than the science fiction variety. At least that will be in the spirit of what was intended for this page. It's true that redirect to either page avoids a double redirect but Minkowski spacetime better destination in my opinion. Sting_au Talk 11:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment. I'm not a physicist. I started the page after reading Hyperspace (book). Changing the page to a redirect makes sense. --JWSchmidt (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.