Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydro Cannon
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hydro Cannon
This is a description of an attack from the Pokemon games, it is game guide and violates WP:NOT Bhamv 12:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and do not redirect. This can certainly be discussed in a relevant pokemon article. A Train take the 16:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not redirect? If it's discussed somewhere, a redirect will help a user find that information and discourage recreation of this article. — brighterorange (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Because a description of the features of a single, specific attack from the Pokemon games, including its tactical uses and strengths/weaknesses clearly crosses the line into game guide information, violating WP:NOT. I don't think any Pokemon article on Wikipedia could include such information. Bhamv 04:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not redirect? If it's discussed somewhere, a redirect will help a user find that information and discourage recreation of this article. — brighterorange (talk) 18:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete aggree with A Train -- Diletante 17:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to whatever Pokemon-related article is most appropriate. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 18:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete utter rubbish. David Spart (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log) 21:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pokécruft. JuJube 23:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:NOT, and it's quite factually inaccurate... SuperDT 23:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 02:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.