Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was derp. ‑Scottywong | confer _ 17:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Human

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per obvious Conflict of Interest. Northern Antarctica (₵) 15:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COI? Says who? [1] AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: And this is why websites have CAPTCHA. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 16:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because of my COI. Dark Sun (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've heard of them, lots of work went into the article, and if we deleted this we would have to delete articles about lots of other species. Edison (talk) 17:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.