Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hull Zero Three
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hull Zero Three (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Contested PROD but non-notable per WP:BK -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or temporarily userfy. This is a significant work by a notable author. Although not yet released (November), pre-release reviews are already emerging. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Marcus Qwertyus 23:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to author's page, with no prejudice against spinout when the book is published and once it meets WP:BK. Jclemens (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This nom was one of a bunch all at once by the nominator that even included novels by John Grisham. I don't have the time or inclination to look into yet another one, but everyone I looked at was a keep, and in the absence of a understandable basis for this nomination, we should keep this one as well.--Milowent • talkblp-r 05:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Anticipated book, due Nov 22, by a notable author. Articles like this are a good way to entice new editors. This will be an article. It served no purpose to have deletions in the early versions. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.