Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoochery Distillery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Hog Farm _Talk 05:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoochery Distillery

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and non notable. A long list of local awards, but no substantial non-` promotional coverage. DGG ( talk ) 09:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I stopped at 'oldest continually operating distillery' and then realised it was founded in 1995. Indeed!!! But a Google news search gets quite a lot of coverage. [1] [2] Someone needs to add it all to the article, it's here [3] but the company passes WP:GNG and does indeed have "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." so passes WP:ORGCRITE Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - covered in multiple independent sources and demonstrates WP:ORG. Deus et lex (talk) 02:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG as covered in multiple independent sources. CeltJungleSnake (talk) 08:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.