Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office, Sydney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office. Nakon 01:13, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office, Sydney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. trade offices do not have the status of consulates or embassies. There is no significant third party coverage of this one. LibStar (talk) 06:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 10:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 10:40, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge ZHWP keeps all the HKETO at zh:香港經濟貿易辦事處 (海外) (Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office). Together with Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office, Berlin and London uses only primary sources (from Hong Kong Government and the Offices themselves) or evidence of mere existence, and it is hard to establish separate notability. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 14:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office. No point in keeping this permanet stub.--Antigng (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.