Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honeymoon (2018 film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 23:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Honeymoon (2018 film)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Honeymoon (2018 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. No significant coverage, review or anything. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as has been reviewed in national level sources such as The Times of India here and Cinestaan already in the article so WP:NFILM criteria 1 is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as per Atlantic306 above and passes WP:NFILM and has WP:SIGCOV. Also, been covered in WP:RS like Anandabazar Patrika here. Run n Fly (talk) 04:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Seems notable film. --Gazal world (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep has number of references of review and coverage. Pinakpani (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.