Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Green

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 08:00, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Green

Holly Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable broadcaster with minimal sources and references. - Funky Snack (Talk) 12:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - someone seems to be targeting articles about female meteorologists for deletion - this follows the deletion of Bee Tucker. It is a sad reflection on the sexism of the male-dominated editorship of Wikipedia, while articles about non-notable male meteorologists such as Matt Taylor (meteorologist) remain in place. Peteinterpol (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is not a target for female meteorologists. It is simply following Wikipedia's rules. There is no significant coverage about this article, and therefore, fails WP:GNG. If you can find anything that will be classed as a reliable sources, maybe the article can stay. I've said before, I will take a look at the Matt Taylor (meteorologist) article in due course. - Funky Snack (Talk) 06:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 22:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.