Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holly Glasser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Glasser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable journalist who is EIC of a non-notable magazine. There is 0 coverage of her and her filmography roles are, well, pretty much non existent so also fails WP:NACTOR CUPIDICAE💕 15:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:58, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable journalist. If the magazine you are editor-in-chief of is not notable that does not add towards notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete subject is not notable in sourced articles, and presence in film/fashion industry is not notable. Redoryxx (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG as most coverage stems from non-notable blogs. Doesn't qualify for WP:NACTOR as most of her roles are minor or uncredited. I can't confirm the notability of the magazine, but I haven't been able to find too much online. — BriefEdits (talk) 00:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.