Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History Repeating (Conflicts)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 10:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History Repeating (Conflicts) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A short essay about the fate of human civilisation. But not an encyclopaedia article. The magazine article linked to has only a tangential relevance to the subject. Prod removed without comment. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 09:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - this sort of musing doesn't belong in WP. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Has no place here. It reads like an unproofed book jacket. Snowfire51 (talk) 09:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - not encyclopedic article Macy's123 10:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Shoessss |  Chat  13:09, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:OR essay. Lankiveil (talk) 13:42, 23 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete per above. Everyone's comments above have been kind, and in this season of charity, I hope that we may continue in that spirit. Perhaps Professor Kaku's theories can be summarized in another article at some time. Mandsford (talk) 13:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original research, page being used as a bouncing place to read a Cosmo article and promote someone else. Not a proper use of Wikipedia. Pharmboy (talk) 14:03, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a WP:non-notable concept written as a personal musings with no way to verify it has been reviewed by good sources. Interesting idea, but not WP material. Sorry, dude. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As interesting as it is to learn that editing conflicts might not be completely unrelated to an asteroid hitting the Earth, this page does not serve the purpose of Wikipedia. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.