Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilltop Radio
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. NJA (t/c) 10:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hilltop Radio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
another non-notable pirate radio station Rapido (talk) 11:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 18:03, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article is factual, has content and references. While a minor station it is still notable as the zoo programming a new approach whcih moved to national broadcast on licensed radio stations in future years. Aleksdeg (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Comment - Can you point out references and proof of factual content? It's completely unsourced! I notice you were the main editor of the article. If they are notable for whatever programming, zoo or not, then I would expect newspaper articles, etc about them. The Daily Telegraph article doesn't talk about Hilltop Radio and the photos tell us nothing. The Thameside radio reference mentioned Hilltop Radio a single time, and anyway fails WP:SPS. This article fails WP:OR and WP:N massively, and should be deleted. Rapido (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I wasn't the main author - I simply constructively tidied up an existing entry. Given the clandestine nature of pirate radio there is bound to only be limited printed reference material available. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleksdeg (talk • contribs) 12:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Can you point out references and proof of factual content? It's completely unsourced! I notice you were the main editor of the article. If they are notable for whatever programming, zoo or not, then I would expect newspaper articles, etc about them. The Daily Telegraph article doesn't talk about Hilltop Radio and the photos tell us nothing. The Thameside radio reference mentioned Hilltop Radio a single time, and anyway fails WP:SPS. This article fails WP:OR and WP:N massively, and should be deleted. Rapido (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.