Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillsong Church São Paulo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neither of the Keep arguments address the delete concerns that the article fails the main notability guideline due to a lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Davewild (talk) 19:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hillsong Church São Paulo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. It's a church plant of a notable church, but does not meet WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, no evidence it needs a separate article from the parent church —Мандичка^YO 😜 06:21, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the article about this church is very important and will grow. The article is good because it has reliable and concrete references. Tha wikipedia have many articles about regional churches of Hillsong, as Hillsong Church Kiev, Hillsong Church Cape Town, Hillsong Church Paris and Hillsong Church London. --DavidStarIsrael7 (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Importance is not a valid criteria, notability in the relation to having others write about it is. Also, see WP:OSE. I'll review those articles and nominate the ones that should be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- None of the four had a sufficient number of sources and were tagged for two years or longer. I nominated them all. Thanks for alerting us to their existence. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is good and follows all standards imposed by Wikipedia for an article recently created. It is worthy to be maintained. --LewisDaCosta98 (talk) 19:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: This editor is a new account and the editor's second edits: here. WP:SPA and user page bears uncanny similarity to User:DavidStarIsrael7. May have to start a SPI. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, too little information, and all is sourced by three non-independent references. No reason for a separated page. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 02:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.