Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher education in Minnesota

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 16:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Higher education in Minnesota

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article looks like an essay with no connection to the rest of Wikipedia. Not like an encyclopedic article. The topic is more like a summary of scientific results on return on education in Minnesota. One would expect something like an overview of higher education instutitions in Minnesota from this article, but that is already served in List of colleges and universities in Minnesota. bender235 (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete' Appears to be academic in nature and not encyclopedic. It appears to present facts and findings that would lead to further research or action. It's basically a short term paper and not an informational article. Chris Moore (talk) 11:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article clearly is an essay or research paper, as it even says that this is researching a topic and presents the research methods. It presents arguments and theories with some facts and references around them. The article's topic may be a good, useful one, but this version is clearly just someone's research on particular topics and questions better suited for a journal than an encyclopedia. Scarlettail (talk) 20:40, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an essay, not an article, and Wikipedia isn't the place for that. Novusuna ^talk 22:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not an encyclopedia article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.