Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hideout Pictures

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Average Joes Entertainment. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hideout Pictures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no sourcing at present apart from a link to the company's website. Searching for sources, I find nothing but directory entries, passing mentions, and primary sources such as court filings - nothing approaching WP:CORPDEPTH, so fails WP:NCORP. GirthSummit (blether) 21:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. GirthSummit (blether) 21:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Update More sources have been added - a NY Times article that does not mention the subject, and a few IMDB entries (unreliable source per WP:UGC and WP:Perennial sources. Still no CORPDEPTH-compliant sourcing. GirthSummit (blether) 18:33, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.