Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herrie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Herrie

Just another run-of-the-mill media player that isn't notable, doesn't demonstrate notability, doesn't claim notability, has no sources, and doesn't do anything that every other media player written by Joe Bob doesn't do. Miami33139 (talk) 03:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't demonstrate notability. I believe it to be blatant advertising (CSD G11). OlYeller^Talktome 07:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - It does claim to be notable based on the award it received, although I'd argue that making third place is borderline. §FreeRangeFrog 19:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That award doesn't even seem to be in news.google.com searching en français. Miami33139 (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree, thus the weak part of my vote :) But a claim to notability is that, and needs to be considered. §FreeRangeFrog 00:06, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Slapping a ribbon on something does not make it notable. Letsdrinktea (talk) 00:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then how come we have inclusion criteria that depend on awards? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Miami, while Google News doesn't mention the Les Trophées du Libre, Google itself does quite well. Linux Magazine and KDE Accessibility] cover the event. They just aren't included by Google News. I'm withholding a vote until I've decided on the third place thing. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.