Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert Hamrol

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Hamrol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this 1906 San Francisco earthquake survivor notable? I don't think so, particularly because coverage of him was based on the mistaken belief that he was the last living survivor at the time of his death. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 05:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:16, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge -- This is a typical one event case. the 1906 earthquake was a major catastrophe. It might be worth having a paragraph at the end of the article on that listing the last survivors, but otherwise the subject is utterly NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The population of SF at the time was about 300,000. Our article on the earthquake gives a death toll of 3,000. Approximately 99% of the inhabitants survived. Which of the 297,000 survived the lognest after that time is the essence of triviality. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 20:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to 1906 San Francisco earthquake, where he is already mentioned so no further merging is necessary. --MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to 1906_San_Francisco_earthquake#Centennial_commemorations David in DC (talk) 23:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.