Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Do
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Closing based on an early consensus. Missvain (talk) 00:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Henry Do (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I fail to see how Do is notable. Your Shot through NatGeo is something anyone can enter and they choose hundreds of photos for each contest, it's not unique or notable. The coverage is...nearly non existent, most sources are passing mentions or not reliable. See below:
Source assessment table:
| ||||
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| http://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/photo-of-the-day/2017/08/shiprock-new-mexico-navajo/ | 
|
~ |  This is just a byline with his name on it
|
✘ No |
| https://www.boredpanda.com/brondby-haveby-allotment-gardens-copenhagen-denmark/ |
|
|
This is a community member post, akin to a message board
|
✘ No |
| https://www.insider.com/beautiful-aerial-photos-2019-9 |
|
|
He provided courtesy photos - nothing more nothing less
|
✘ No |
| https://www.lonelyplanet.com/articles/broendby-haveby-denmark-from-above | ~ It's mostly an interview | ~ | It's mostly an interview, not about Do
|
✘ No |
| https://www.mirror.co.uk/travel/news/gallery/breathtaking-aerial-images-showcase-worlds-17798042 | ~ | As per WP:RSP
|
His name as a byline is not coverage, even so this is a listicle similar to the other sources
|
✘ No |
| https://www.dji.com/altitude/dji-creator-profile-henry-do | interview
|
~ for primary infromation |
|
✘ No |
| https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/13/politics/democratic-debate-2016-instagram/index.html | ~ it's not written by him but it's a single passing mention and a quote | ~ |
|
✘ No |
| https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/206924040/henry-do |
|
|
a profile on adobe? not even close.
|
✘ No |
| https://www.getolympus.com/ca/en/learn_center/travel-influencer | interview with someone who uses their product
|
~ for primary information only | influencers receive products in exchange for advertising, which is a long way of saying this is effectively a paid interview.
|
✘ No |
| https://fulldrone.com/behind-controls-henry-do/ | interview in a non rs
|
~ possibly for primary info |
|
✘ No |
| https://agoraimages.com/blog/2019/08/01/the-worlds-best-photo-of-light2019/ | ~ | ~ | Not coverage in the slightest
|
✘ No |
| https://petapixel.com/2019/09/04/international-dance-photography-conference-set-for-jan-31-feb-2-in-phoenix/ |
|
|
no mention of Henry Do.
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- Delete a non-notable photogrpaher.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete — With a source evaluation table that detailed it’s safe to say the subject isn’t notable enough for a biographical article on them. Celestina007 (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - The subject of the article probably falls under WP:CREATIVE. The are not widely cited and thus do not meet #1. They are not known for creating a significant new technique and thus do not meet #2. They have not created a notable work, so #3 is not met. Their work is not yet significant, so #4 of WP:CREATIVE is not met. In addition, there is no significant coverage of this subject. In the dji.com reference is PR from a corporate website. The fulldrone.com reference is basically a blog and not very close to a WP:RS source. For this person to be notable, I'd like to see multiple independent non-trivial articles in better sources, ideally WP:RS sources. Cxbrx (talk) 23:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- strong delete - not notable in any way, and I don't see how it could me greatly improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 777burger (talk • contribs) 02:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The problem is that he's not a fine art photographer, so it's difficult to show he's notable, for example, by exhibits at major art galleries or news stories about him. Bearian (talk) 20:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.