Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heena Parmar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Hut 8.5 17:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heena Parmar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress. Independent coverage in reliable sources not found. Times of India is not independent enough for notability. Needs salting as well. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NACTOR. SweetCanadianMullet 03:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She has had roles in several notable TV series, including a lead role. I simply do not understand the comment about the Times of India, published since 1838 and the largest circulation English language newspaper in the world. I see many articles about Heena Parmar in that paper. Where is the lack of independence of that newspaper? What is the argument for salting? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Cullen328. The Times of India is a reliable source. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:53, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.