Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatim El Otmani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hatim El Otmani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 09:37, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Environment, and Morocco. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment- I found this [1] Currently inbtw to vote because of his contributions. Wasilatlovekesy (talk) 07:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That's a different person. 196.112.247.211 (talk) 10:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I wasn't the one who added that link! so I kindly ask you to remove the article from the deletion sorting CiconiaBiblio (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Most of the references are passing mentions in the first block. I will not do a source review for that first block because there is nothing there. scope_creep^Talk 16:24, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete complete vanity spam sourced to non rs and blackhat SEO. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 18:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Otherwise, this would be a Soft Deletion and I'm guessing would be instantly restored.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per Praxidicae/GRINCHIDICAE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scribbie (talk • contribs) 07:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Mentioned here [2] but hardly substantial coverage. What's used now in the article is interviews, primary sourcing and non-RS. Oaktree b (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.