Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Raza Bukhari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Raza Bukhari

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded without improvement. An impressive h-Index of 1 and a total of 3 citations and no in-depth coverage certainly certainly meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 11:57, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass NPROF. Too junior to be notable. Mccapra (talk) 14:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF, no sign of other notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Student awards explicitly do not pass WP:PROF and there appears to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:PROF or WP:BIO, also Awards and Research section references are not compatible to the content. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:NPROF. Not yet notable. Bruxton (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an ordinary university student. Bearian (talk) 16:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.