Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold Casely
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete (G3) Neutralitytalk 22:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Harold Casely
- Harold Casely (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This biography may or may not be a hoax, but, in any case, I can't find any third-party sources that mention this author. If "an author not known very well" means he is only on Wikipedia, then this article probably shouldn't exist, as it doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Logan Talk Contributions 23:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:HOAX, quite an endearing one, but no evidence that Harold ever existed beyond this article and its copies.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 23:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing verifiability in spectacular manner. -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unverifiable, likely a hoax. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There doesn't seem to be any sources that show this person is notable. Inter rest (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.