Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harita Kata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harita Kata

Harita Kata (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Single source that is not WP:IS. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Environment, and India. UtherSRG (talk) 16:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete Sourcing is primary as given in the article, and I don't see sourcing we can use in my search. Unless there is some in the native language of course... Oaktree b (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.