Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hard White (Nicki Minaj song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hard White (Nicki Minaj song)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album track fails WP:NSONGS; failed to chart (only in Bubbling Under) and content is based on album reviews, not articles about the song. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:31, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete User:Cornerstonepicker's explanation is clear. LikeMeercats (talk) 00:12, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In no way this passes WP:GNG for WP:NSONGS. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 13:52, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Queen (Nicki Minaj album) as it is the parent album. I understand a preference for deletion though to avoid the article being recreated in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for only getting mentions within album reviews. Something I should however note, Cornerstonepicker, is that charts (or lack thereof) are completely irrelevant to whether tracks meet WP:NSONGS, which states a song needs to be covered at least decently within multiple secondary sources that aren't album reviews or affiliated with artist/label. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article. Not necessary to create pages for just any song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qualitist (talk • contribs) 10:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not have reliable independent sources to convince the importance and thus fails WP:GNG and the song was not that popular enought so fails WP:NSONGS.Vinodbasker (talk) 12:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.