Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Happy Village

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Happy Village

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced entirely to fan wikis, which are not reliable sources. Even so, there are no reliable independent sources that can explain why this is notable. Without neutral and independent sources that can WP:verify notability, this fails the WP:GNG and WP:NOTJUSTPLOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:11, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect as with Moonside and Eagleland. Marasmusine (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Earthbound's article. The fact that all it cites are EarthBound Wikia pages doesn't support much of an important article. SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The fictional village does not meet the general notability guideline and it is a plot-only description of a fictional work. Like other Earthbound-related articles, all content fails verifiability since it uses unreliable sources and Wikipedia is not a video game guide. Jfgslo (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.