Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanuman Mandir 82 RB
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The keep arguments were solidly within policy guidelines. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 17:48, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hanuman Mandir 82 RB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#Hanuman Mandir 82 RB Xx236 (talk) 10:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 November 15. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:25, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The nomination is actually slightly vague (not the extent of WP:SKCRIT#1, I think), but the questions here are whether the place exists, and if so, does it pass WP:GEOFEAT? Even the discussion linked to has an editor seemingly saying both; that on the one hand that they don't think it exists, but that, on the other, it's "just a locality/area of Raisinghnagar." I was tempted to close this as keep, per the vague nomination, and the fact that even (what can be taken as) the co-nominator's uncertainty as to whether it doesn't exist. But, it is better for the community to enjoy this one I think.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — fortunavelut lunaRarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre. 06:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: The nomination is actually slightly vague (not the extent of WP:SKCRIT#1, I think), but the questions here are whether the place exists, and if so, does it pass WP:GEOFEAT? Even the discussion linked to has an editor seemingly saying both; that on the one hand that they don't think it exists, but that, on the other, it's "just a locality/area of Raisinghnagar." I was tempted to close this as keep, per the vague nomination, and the fact that even (what can be taken as) the co-nominator's uncertainty as to whether it doesn't exist. But, it is better for the community to enjoy this one I think.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — fortunavelut lunaRarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre. 06:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. It already had a reference for the 2001 census, and I've replaced it with one for the 2011 census. Government-recognized populated places are always kept. It probably needs to be renamed, though. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:NPLACE. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.