Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hang On
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Revert. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Hang On (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable-band has no article, links are blogs and amazon.com Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete content and revert to disambiguation page that was clobbered. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert as per JHunterJ. This is actually an album from a band (The Goodnight Fields) whose page was deleted for copyright infringement a year ago. The album doesn't seem to be all that notable in its own right. The band's website is gone and the only source that seems to work is the Amazon link listing the album. Not quite sure why the page links to a different album (Hot Fuss) on other Wikipedias either. I'd have tagged this as WP:CSD#A9 had it not been a DAB page prior. Funny Pika! 08:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Funny Pika! 08:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Revert to dab page: non-notable band, well-formed dab page. PamD 13:39, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.