Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamdi Mohamed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hamdi Mohamed

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a biography of someone most known for being elected as one of five commissioners of the Port of Seattle. That is a not a highly significant position, not a state-wide office, not the head of the commission. Sources in the article do cover her and the election, but all are routine local coverage that occurs for every local election. (There is a sentence in Bloomberg which is not local, but is about local candidates across the country running on climate change issues). Does not meet GNG. MB 03:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Washington. MB 03:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete nonnotable local politician Loew Galitz (talk) 03:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Women. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seattle Port Commission is not a level of political office that confers an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, and the article is sourced to the purely run of the mill level of local election campaign coverage that anybody running for any local political office anywhere can always show — but at this level of significance, a person would have to show a credible reason why she was of nationalized significance that exceeded the significance of other members of other local government committees, which has not been demonstrated at all. Bearcat (talk) 14:54, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.