Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallspot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallspot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. There are a few references, but none of them add up to notability. The Register Guard is in-depth but the only other in-depth I found was from Portland Business Journal and it reads like a press release. Everything else is minor, local, interview, or from an unreliable source. CNMall41 (talk) 04:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:NCORP. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 05:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:48, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:CORP -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.