Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halcon

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 07:41, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Halcon

Appears to be vanity. Page does not establish notability. Google review finds about a dozen references to "Halcon Technologies", and many of those are on linkdumps. Reportedly they have a grand total of 24 members, which doesn't reach notability in my opinion. --Kelly Martin 21:54, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

Delete not notable. --RoySmith 22:11, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete platform for external link. —Korath (Talk) 00:43, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, smells like a stealth ad to my sniffer. Wyss 07:44, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Weak Keep. The original article was POV copyvio, but it seems that Slim tried to clean it up. Although the article is quite small and may seem like an ad, it is much less of an ad than it was before, and Slim managed to get rid of most of the ad chaff. I say keep it. --Death phoenix 03:50, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete, page does not establish notability. Andris 23:26, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.