Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haar Jeet (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will re-open if sources are located within a reasonable amount of time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haar Jeet (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTABILITY Panam2014 (talk) 20:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:12, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 21:17, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unreferenced since February 2012 (two months before supposed cancellation), all plot and casting, premise description is clearly promotionally toned. Indian television shows are rarely notable. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep as per WP:TVSERIES nationally broadcast tv series are normally notable with offline sources if not online sources and Indian tv shows are no less notable than US series Atlantic306 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Atlantic306: please provide sources.--Panam2014 (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• • will search tomorrow, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • changed to weak keep as there could be offline sources but online could only find this that is directly about the show but somewhat promotional, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--Not an iota of decent sourcing, even in vernacular sources.All mentions appear to be semblant to trivial specks in interviews of lead actors in tabloids and entertainment supplements.No indepth coverage is existent.And, AFAIK, being a TV show is not an autoindicator of encyclopedic notability.~ Winged Blades^Godric 17:53, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.