Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/György Gát

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

György Gát (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability; BLP with no sources Sirlanz 01:08, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- there's actually a fairly clear claim to notability -- first independent TV producer in Hungary, as well as creator of several nationally aired shows. It does have insufficient sources -- however, the Hungarian language version of the article seems to have several citations. Someone with the appropriate language skills should be able to move them over. matt91486 (talk) 22:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that the Eastern name order is used in Hungarian, so most sources will use the form "Gát György":

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Phil Bridger (talk) 09:11, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I added a BLPPROD as it was unsourced - since that time, sources have been added, and per them individual appears notable. Passes GNG, per my approximation, though I don't read Hungarian so I can't assess some of the sources. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 13:53, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I believe that the sources I have added to this article demonstrate notability. The subject's production, Linda, was clearly ground-breaking in communist Hungary, and he has followed that up with more notable work. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per WP:HEY as the article has been significantly improved since nomination with the addition of references to reliable sources that demonstrate that WP:Creative is met and the article should remain Atlantic306 (talk) 20:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.